Category Archives: Information Accessibility

In praise of pragmatism

I was talking to a customer the other day and thinking to myself how much I enjoy working with customers like her. Why? Because she is a sensible pragmatist with a ‘can do’ approach.

When faced with a web site which she knows presents real difficulties around accessibility she didn’t miss a beat when a user came to her with a problem.

The user was Deaf and was struggling with the particular specialist and abstract vocabulary of the site. For someone with New Zealand Sign as a first language and English their second the information needed was hard to access and understand. My customer did not turn her away or refuse to help. She concluded that such requests would be quite rare, and found a simple, individual face-to-face solution, where the user got the information and some top-shelf service. It was a one off cost and worth it she felt.

Who said public service was dead!

1 Comment

Filed under Information Accessibility, Web Accessibility

The United Nations International Year of Languages

Today was the International Day of Mother Languages, launching the United Nations International Year of Languages.

It is also the International Year of the Potato. So there you have it, two of life’s necessities, language and spuds! Both sustain us.

At the launch event we had presentations on the status of two of our national languages, on Pacific languages, and community languages. It was the presentation from the Deaf community that particularly made me think. Rachel Noble, who is CEO of the Deaf Association celebrated the status of NZ Sign as our third national language. She pointed out that under our law it has the highest status of any Sign Language in the world.

This is all well and good but where next? As with a good deal of legislation, there is the law but there are no resources to make sure it really works. We have a school curriculum but there needs to be more. Rachel raised the question of how to ensure there is progress. Should there be a Sign Language Commission like the Maori Language Commission? Do we need a national Sign Language strategy like the Maori Language Strategy? How do we promote the discussion to decide what needs to happen?

Watching a Signer is pure communication theatre, and very beautiful. Although I miss most of it, and can’t really learn it, I still enjoy watching while I listen to the interpreters. (We need more of them too.)

Perhaps with the assistance of UNESCO here and other supportive organisations, government and non-government we can make some progress this year. Languages matter!

2008 Languages Matter!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Disability Rights, Information Accessibility

Accessibility user testing rules OK!

In my experience there are some people who really “get” the whole idea of accessibility, be it web or anything else. They understand the need for web site accessibility testing in the real world with disabled users. There are others, who have learned about its importance, sometimes through bitter experience. They too now understand the need for accessibility testing.

There is still a fairly large group of people who do not understand at all. It is not necessarily malice aforethought, although there are perhaps a very few who think that we crips and blindies and the like are such a small minority that we are really just an irritating nuisance.

But many people still genuinely and sincerely think that if you tick all the boxes for the web standards it will all work like magic. I wish it would, Standards are the basics. Get them right and it won’t be as hard to fix the rest. Web standards are objectively measurable. Many of the other elements which contribute to a truly accessible and usable web site are not objectively measurable. For example, there are still big debates around the use of colour, and in particular colour contrast. Look and feel is another contentions one, as is good navigation, never mind the level of language used on the site.

Standards will, and can, only go so far. The rest is up to planners, designers, information architects, web builders, techies, information managers, content writers and everyone who maintains the site. Listening to and learning from the people who use the site is critical, and learning from their experience, good and bad, will make the real difference between an accessible and usable site, and an inaccessible and user unfriendly site for disabled and older people and everyone else. A lot depends on how much the site owner cares about the customer.

AccEase people are passionate about making sure that all of the information for all of the people all of the time is a reality. To this end we will be increasing our user testing services soon to help web site owners make their sites more accessible. Watch this space!

Testing web sites with disabled people and implementing the test findings will make a difference, not only to us, who are after all 20% of the population, but to other users as well.

Nothing about us without us!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Information Accessibility, Web Accessibility

Rise up and protest against inaccessible information

Rise is the new print publication from Ministry of Social Development. It is also available on their web site. I don’t know what it is about as I can’t read it, and I suspect lots of other people won’t be able to either. I can say it is probably one of the ugliest publications I have ever seen, and I have seen a fair few. It’s probably a designer’s dream but it’s a reader’s nightmare. I think you would almost need to have 2020 vision to read it, or at the very least a good pair of reading specs. I tried it on a colleague who is within the range of so called normal sight and he struggled.

It is not entirely clear to me who the audience is. It is described as MSD’s flagship publication, and I would like to read one or two of the articles, but the headings in particular are an abomination. Some are large but in a strange distorted font. Others are tiny and grey on white. Body type is too small and again is grey. What IS it with grey?

The web isn’t much better. We tried the pdf and found some visual elements didn’t show and others flashed alarmingly. The possible cause was a version issue, The Rise document is in version seven of the Adobe Acrobat and the machine we viewed it on had version five of the reader.

We then tried the Word document. It was a bit more readable. However there was no contents page with handy hyperlinks, the images were very large and the lines of the body text too long and justified, which does not read well on the screen, and there are no page numbers. This is definitely not an equivalent document, not even to the original print one.

There are probably reasons for all of this relating to publication processes, but as the reader the message I get is that only some audiences are important. Others don’t matter.

It is really time that large organisations with dollars to spend on communications start to take their audiences seriously, and have proper planned and integrated processes to get their messages across. And readers shouldn’t put up with it any more.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Information Accessibility