Category Archives: Inclusion

Ten things you should know about people with low vision

Many people misunderstand vision loss. They assume that you are either blind or you can see reasonably well. The truth is quite different. This is my attempt at clarification.

  1. Low vision is very different from blindness, although they both exist on a vision continuum. If you have low or impaired vision, it will probably affect your; clarity of vision (visual acuity), ability to differentiate colours, and/or range of vision (visual fields).
  2. Low vision does not mean we are all the same. Low vision can affect each person differently. This has significant implications for information accessibility and real world testing of web sites.
  3. Making things big will not always help, although it might in some situations. We also need clarity and definition
  4. We don’t all need identical colour contrast although we will need good contrast
  5. While we may look at you while you direct us, we might not have a clue where you are pointing. You might need to describe more. It is not funny to make us try and guess who you are if we don’t immediately recognise you in the street.
  6. It you ask us how much we can see you may not get a sensible answer. You are asking for a comparison between what you and I can see.
  7. We may have other impairments which may present different issues in different situations
  8. We won’t all wear glasses and we don’t all use screen readers or Jaws, canes or guide dogs.
  9. There are a lot more of than you think. Over 80,000 New Zealanders are blind or live with a sight limitation that cannot be corrected with glasses or contact lenses. Of this number, only 11,500 are completely blind. Numbers will grow as our population ages.
  10. Like all disabled people, when we state our needs we are not being a nuisance or demanding – we need these things. We really need clear makings of the edges of steps for example. If you aren’t sure just ask, respectfully.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Disability Issues, Disability Rights, Inclusion, Information Accessibility, Web Accessibility

Ending poverty for disabled people

It has been said that without including the 650 million disabled women, men and children in poverty reduction strategies, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) cannot be met. The theme for this year’s UN International Day of Disabled Persons, December 3rd, is “Keeping the promise: Mainstreaming disability in the Millennium Development Goals towards 2015 and beyond”.  The MDGs are a set of internationally agreed development objectives for the global community. Yet they do not include any mention of disability, despite the poverty of disabled people, with disabled women and children being among the poorest people in the world.

While it is fair to acknowledge that, as Prof Gerard Quinn has said “All countries are developing countries when it comes to disability,” disabled people in countries like New Zealand are generally well off compared to the 400 million disabled people living in Asia and the Pacific.

It is important to think about and respond to issues of poverty and exclusion among disabled people in New Zealand, especially to the report from the Welfare Working Group and the report from the Alternative Welfare Working Group

But how well is New Zealand fulfilling its international obligations under Article 32 of the Disability Rights Convention (CRPD)? You can influence the Government’s first CRPD report to the UN. Do it today.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Disability Issues, Disability Rights, Inclusion, Women

Inclusion tourism

Compelling demographics, the need for industry engagement and for better auditing processes, and the glaring absence of accommodation providers were all features of New Zealand’s first Access Tourism conference.

But I was particularly interested in the claim by Bill Forrester that the issue is not so much accessible infrastructure as the way accessible tourism is not valued by both operators and promoters alike. He talked about going beyond grudgingly ‘accommodating’ disabled people to welcoming them and including them as business as usual in very real and tangible ways, to the point where statistics about their numbers were not collected.

This has set me thinking about the application of this perspective on access to our tourism industry and other areas of daily life, and I don’t just mean the built environment. This attitude persists despite some compelling figures. Twenty percent of the New Zealand population live with disability. By 2031 people over 65 will be 26% of the population with an accompanying increase in the disability rate. This is a significant market by anyone’s reckoning, even allowing for some overlap.  In countries which are our main source of tourists the rapidly ageing population is even more marked.

Dr Sandra Rhodda, access tourism researcher says of the revenue value of the access tourism market, “In Canada, for example, pwds account for $25 billion in consumer spending and in Australia the accessible tourism market is believed to be worth around $4.8bn to the Australian economy.”

Is this blinkered attitude because the non-disabled youth market is cooler, sexier and more glamorous for the advertising industry, the marketers and the PR people, who seem to me to be mostly under 40, or is it simply that older and disabled people have been invisible for so long that it is hard to take us seriously, even when we have the dosh. Perhaps it is simply a failure of the imagination.

The only products marketed to people over fifty seem to be rest homes, erectile dysfunction medication, mobility scooters, anti-ageing creams and laxative drinks. Well whoop de do!

Perhaps the providers and marketers of tourism will wake up just in time to watch the tourist dollars disappearing over the horizon to more welcoming destinations.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Disability Issues, Disability Rights, Inclusion, Information Accessibility, Travel, Web Accessibility

Accessible Tourism?

I am taking a break at the halfway point through my Ten points to Accessible Information series. The series will resume soon.

New Zealand tourism has to do more than grudgingly meet minimum standards, or international visitors will not return, and they will tell others of their bad experiences.

Where is customer service?

I don’t often write about physical access as it is not my area of expertise. But a friend of mine recently had some difficulty with public transport after completing the Rail Trail. The reasons that were offered for the refusals to take her powered wheelchair on public transport reminded me of how much disabled people are still seen as a problem to be avoided rather than valued customers to be served like anyone else. The so-called number-eight wire mentality and the innovative ‘can do’ attitude beloved of kiwis was sadly lacking in this instance. Not to mention simply providing good old-fashioned quality service to a fare-paying customer.

Accessible tourism is becoming increasingly ‘business as usual’ abroad and we are being left behind. The Rail Trail is promoted as an iconic twenty-first century southern experience, but this won’t wash internationally if the infrastructure to support it is still in the dark ages.

Accessible tourism should be the norm

I decided to have a look around the Interweb to see what I could find about accessible tourism in New Zealand. I found a few specialist tour operators whose websites vary in the quality of their accessibility. I would rather see general tourism services applying accessibility principles, but good luck to those providers for offering an accessible service where it would otherwise be lacking.

There is also a good New Zealand-based Accessible Tourism blog which keeps a watch on the accessible tourism scene in NZ and keeps up to date with international developments. It recently reviewed a report Domestic Tourism Market Segmentation prepared for the Ministry of Tourism which recognises baby boomers as a market segment, But the report identifies disability as a barrier to travel and the blog says

“the report reinforces the idea that it is a person’s disability that is a barrier, rather than  environments such as inaccessible transport and accommodation that are disabling.”

Tourism Ministry out of touch

Oh dear. The Ministry should know of the New Zealand Disability Strategy and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD,) which NZ has ratified. Both of these take a different view of barriers.  The approach taken by the report explains a great deal

I checked for information on “accessible tourism” on the very modern New Zealand.com – where you would expect to find it. I found none. I then tried the Ministry of Tourism site which gave me seven search results of which the first six were totally irrelevant and the seventh took me to an uninformative page with a link to “travel information for those with special needs” which is actually on NewZealand.com listed under “key facts”.  This  left me utterly confused.

Why was it so hard to find? Because  “Travel information for those with special needs” s not what most disabled people would look for.

This outdated page is indicative of the attitude. It reads as if disabled people are inconvenient parcels that have to be conveyed from one place to another and put up with, not welcomed, or even accommodated, (sorry about the pun.)

No one in my wide NZ and international (travelling) networks is likely to feel that the term “special needs” is acceptable when the generally recognised term is accessible tourism. Other travellers might have ‘wants’ or even ‘desires.’ Someone else has arbitrarily decided that disabled people have ‘special needs’ (for ‘special’ read second class).

The tone of the page is grudging. It does not reflect an understanding of the audience. With inspiring headings such as

  • Disabled Facilities
  • Accommodation for the disabled
  • Transport for the Disabled, and
  • Food Allergies

it is hardly an enticing read.

The tourism market is growing and the potential customer base is ageing, and with that come higher rates of disability. In tough times we need to see the market as it is and behave accordingly.

1 Comment

Filed under Disability Issues, Disability Rights, Inclusion, Information Accessibility, Travel, Web Accessibility